OKRs for Engineering Teams: Setting Goals That Drive Technical Excellence
Last verified: February 2026
Overview
Engineering teams often struggle with OKRs because their work feels inherently output-driven: ship features, fix bugs, reduce debt. The key is reframing engineering goals around outcomes — reliability, velocity, user impact — rather than tasks completed.
Why Engineering Teams Need OKRs
Without OKRs, engineering priorities default to:
- Whatever the loudest stakeholder requests
- An ever-growing backlog with no strategic filter
- Technical debt that never gets prioritized
- Reactive firefighting instead of proactive improvement
OKRs give engineering leaders a tool to negotiate priorities, protect strategic investments, and demonstrate impact beyond "features shipped."
Engineering OKR Examples
Platform Reliability
Objective: Deliver a platform our customers can depend on
- KR1: Achieve 99.95% uptime (up from 99.8%)
- KR2: Reduce P1 incident count from 8/quarter to 2/quarter
- KR3: Mean time to recovery under 15 minutes for all P1 incidents
Developer Velocity
Objective: Enable the team to ship faster with confidence
- KR1: Reduce average PR review time from 48 hours to 8 hours
- KR2: Increase deployment frequency from weekly to daily
- KR3: Achieve 85% test coverage on critical paths (up from 60%)
User-Facing Impact
Objective: Make the product noticeably faster for end users
- KR1: Reduce p95 page load time from 3.2s to under 1.5s
- KR2: Reduce API response time from 400ms to under 150ms
- KR3: Zero user-reported performance complaints (currently ~5/week)
Technical Debt
Objective: Modernize the codebase to support the next 2 years of growth
- KR1: Migrate 100% of services from legacy framework to current stack
- KR2: Reduce build time from 12 minutes to under 3 minutes
- KR3: Eliminate all critical security vulnerabilities (currently 7)
Team Growth
Objective: Build an engineering culture that attracts top talent
- KR1: Publish 4 engineering blog posts (at least 2 by ICs)
- KR2: 100% of engineers participate in one learning activity (conference, course, book club)
- KR3: Reduce time-to-fill for engineering roles from 65 days to 35 days
Engineering-Specific OKR Tips
- Measure outcomes, not outputs — "Deploy 15 features" is a task list. "Reduce churn from reliability issues by 30%" is an OKR.
- Balance build vs. maintain — Dedicate at least one OKR to reliability, performance, or tech debt each quarter.
- Use engineering metrics — DORA metrics (deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, MTTR) make excellent Key Results.
- Connect to business impact — "Reduce page load time" becomes more compelling as "Reduce page load time to improve conversion rate."
- Protect maker time — OKR check-ins should be lightweight. Don't add process burden to an already process-heavy function.
The DORA Metrics as OKR Key Results
The four DORA metrics align naturally with engineering OKRs:
| DORA Metric | Good KR Target |
|---|---|
| Deployment Frequency | Daily deploys |
| Lead Time for Changes | Under 1 day |
| Change Failure Rate | Under 5% |
| Time to Restore | Under 1 hour |
How Krezzo Helps
Krezzo helps engineering teams set outcome-oriented OKRs, track progress against DORA and custom engineering metrics, and align technical goals with broader company objectives — without adding bureaucratic overhead to the development workflow.
Sources
- Forsgren, Nicole et al. Accelerate. IT Revolution Press, 2018.
- Doerr, John. Measure What Matters. Penguin, 2018.
- krezzo.com